By Brian Figeroux, Esq.

1. Introduction

Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion (DEI) programs, alongside affirmative action initiatives, have long played a crucial role in addressing systemic inequalities in workplaces, educational institutions, and government agencies across the United States. These programs aim to create equitable opportunities for historically marginalized communities, including racial and ethnic minorities, women, individuals with disabilities, and LGBTQ+ populations.

During his presidency (2017–2021), Donald Trump issued several executive orders (EOs) that directly affected DEI initiatives and affirmative action programs. His administration’s approach largely sought to redefine the scope of such programs, arguing that they promoted divisiveness and discrimination against majority groups. Executive actions under the Trump administration targeted workplace diversity training, federal contracting policies, and affirmative action programs in higher education and employment sectors.

This article provides an in-depth analysis of the impact of Trump’s executive orders on DEI programs, both existing and proposed, and their specific implications for affirmative action initiatives.

1. Overview of Key Executive Orders Affecting DEI and Affirmative Action

Several executive orders issued by President Trump directly influenced DEI and affirmative action efforts, fundamentally altering policies related to diversity training, hiring practices, and federal funding compliance. The most significant orders include:

1. Executive Order 13950 – Combating Race and Sex Stereotyping

Issued in September 2020, EO 13950 aimed to curtail the use of DEI training programs that the administration argued promoted “divisive concepts” such as systemic racism and implicit bias. Key provisions included:

• Prohibiting federal agencies and contractors from using DEI training that suggested the U.S. was inherently racist or sexist.
• Limiting funding for organizations found to be engaging in training that “assigns fault” based on race or gender.
• Increasing scrutiny of DEI initiatives across federal workplaces and contractors.

2. Executive Order 13988 – Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation

Although not directly aimed at limiting DEI initiatives, EO 13988 sought to redefine anti-discrimination laws to protect LGBTQ+ individuals, highlighting the administration’s mixed approach to DEI-related issues. However, it faced challenges from conservative groups arguing it conflicted with religious freedom.

3. Executive Order 13769 – Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States (Travel Ban)

Often referred to as the “Muslim Ban,” this order indirectly impacted DEI efforts by restricting entry from several predominantly Muslim countries, affecting educational and workplace diversity efforts. Organizations with a global focus on inclusion faced challenges in recruiting talent and ensuring diversity.

4. Rescinding Obama-era Affirmative Action Guidelines

The Trump administration rescinded guidance issued under the Obama administration that encouraged universities and employers to consider race as a factor in admissions and hiring to promote diversity. The rescission led to:

• Increased legal scrutiny of affirmative action programs.
• Encouragement of race-neutral admissions and hiring policies.
• A chilling effect on DEI efforts in academia and corporate settings.

III. Impact on Existing DEI Programs

The executive orders issued during Trump’s presidency led to substantial disruptions in ongoing DEI programs, particularly within federal agencies and government contractors. These disruptions included:

1. Reduction in DEI Training Programs

• Many government agencies and federally contracted companies suspended or significantly altered their DEI programs to comply with EO 13950.
• Fear of federal audits and funding withdrawal led organizations to curtail discussions on topics such as systemic racism, unconscious bias, and white privilege.
• A shift from comprehensive DEI initiatives to more compliance-focused, race-neutral diversity efforts.

2. Funding Challenges for DEI Initiatives

• Federal grants and contracts that supported DEI efforts faced heightened scrutiny, with some programs losing funding due to alleged violations of the new restrictions.
• DEI efforts in the non-profit sector were also affected, as organizations with federal ties had to revise their strategies.

3. Increased Hostility Toward DEI Practitioners

• The political climate created by the executive orders fostered an environment where DEI practitioners faced increased backlash and skepticism.
• Employees and advocates promoting diversity initiatives reported increased resistance and hesitancy from leadership.

4. Chilling Effect on Corporate DEI Programs

• While not legally bound by the executive orders, many private corporations with federal contracts reduced the scope of their DEI programs to avoid potential legal complications.
• Internal diversity councils and affinity groups were weakened due to fears of non-compliance with federal policies.

1. Impact on Proposed DEI Programs

Beyond the disruption of existing initiatives, Trump’s executive orders also stifled the development of new DEI programs in several key ways:

1. Deterrence from Expanding DEI Efforts

• Organizations became wary of launching new DEI initiatives due to regulatory uncertainty and potential political scrutiny.
• Institutions that had planned to broaden diversity programs postponed or abandoned them in response to legal threats.

2. Restriction of Inclusive Hiring Practices

• Proposed programs to increase representation of minorities and women in leadership positions faced pushback, with organizations fearing violations of federal requirements.
• Companies with federal contracts hesitated to set diversity hiring targets or quotas.

3. Suppression of Educational DEI Curriculum

• Educational institutions aiming to implement DEI-focused curriculum changes encountered resistance, as the executive orders discouraged programs emphasizing race and gender issues.
• University programs aimed at fostering diversity in STEM fields saw reduced support from government and corporate partners.

1. Impact on Affirmative Action Programs

Affirmative action, a cornerstone of efforts to promote equal opportunity, faced specific and direct challenges under the Trump administration’s executive orders and policies. The rescission of Obama-era affirmative action guidelines and additional actions taken by the administration had the following impacts:

1. Higher Education Admissions

• Universities were pressured to adopt race-neutral admissions policies, resulting in decreased enrollment of underrepresented minority students in elite institutions.
• Legal challenges against affirmative action in admissions gained traction, with the Department of Justice supporting lawsuits against institutions like Harvard University.
• Scholarship programs targeting minority groups were scrutinized, and some institutions revised their criteria to align with the administration’s policies.

2. Workplace Affirmative Action Programs

• Federal contractors faced heightened compliance checks to ensure hiring practices did not prioritize diversity over meritocracy, discouraging affirmative action initiatives.
• Efforts to create pathways for underrepresented groups in government jobs were weakened due to fears of legal repercussions.
• Employee resource groups (ERGs) aimed at supporting minority employees faced challenges in securing funding and institutional support.

3. Public Perception and Backlash

• Affirmative action programs were increasingly portrayed by conservative media and policymakers as discriminatory against white Americans, fueling public skepticism.
• Organizations experienced increased internal debates over the necessity and fairness of affirmative action, leading to a rollback of proactive diversity efforts.

1. Legal Challenges and Responses to Trump’s Executive Orders

Trump’s executive orders sparked numerous legal challenges and public pushback from civil rights organizations, businesses, and advocacy groups. Key developments included:

1. Lawsuits Challenging EO 13950

• Several lawsuits were filed arguing that EO 13950 violated free speech rights and the equal protection clause of the Constitution.
• A federal court temporarily blocked the order in late 2020, citing its potential to suppress crucial conversations about race and gender in workplaces.

2. Response from Advocacy Groups

• Organizations such as the NAACP, ACLU, and business coalitions actively lobbied for the reversal of these orders, highlighting their detrimental impact on diversity efforts.
• Civil rights groups provided guidance to organizations on how to continue DEI work while staying within legal boundaries.

3. Impact of the Biden Administration’s Reversal

• In early 2021, President Joe Biden revoked EO 13950, signaling a return to more supportive policies for DEI and affirmative action initiatives.
• Despite the reversal, the chilling effect of Trump’s policies lingered, with many organizations proceeding cautiously.

VII. Conclusion and Future Outlook

The Trump administration’s executive orders significantly impacted DEI and affirmative action efforts, creating obstacles for both existing and proposed programs. While some of these measures were later reversed, their effects lingered, particularly in the form of heightened scrutiny, funding limitations, and shifts in public perception.

Looking forward, organizations must navigate a complex landscape where DEI efforts continue to face political and legal challenges. It is essential for policymakers, business leaders, and educational institutions to reaffirm their commitment to diversity and inclusion while addressing legitimate concerns about fairness and meritocracy.

Efforts to rebuild and strengthen DEI and affirmative action programs will require:

• Continued legal advocacy to protect diversity initiatives.
• Transparent communication to highlight the benefits of inclusive workplaces and educational institutions.
• Policy innovations that balance diversity goals with legal compliance and business imperatives.

Ultimately, the pursuit of diversity, equity, and inclusion remains a critical goal in achieving a more just and representative society.

  #AffirmativeAction, #AffirmativeActionPrograms, #DiversityEquityInclusion, #LGBTQRights, #RacialEquality, #SocialJustice, #SystemicInequality, #TrumpExecutiveOrders, #WorkplaceDiversity, DEI