By Brian Figeroux, Esq | Editorial credit: NatalieSchorr / shutterstock.com
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is widely celebrated for his unwavering commitment to nonviolent protest as a means of achieving social change. As the face of the Civil Rights Movement, King advocated for peaceful resistance in the fight against racial injustice, firmly believing that nonviolence was the most powerful tool for transforming society. His leadership in pivotal demonstrations such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the March on Washington, and the Selma to Montgomery marches demonstrated his dedication to this philosophy.
However, despite King’s peaceful approach, Black protest—both during his time and in the decades since his passing—has often been met with harsh opposition from law enforcement and the state. Black activism has historically been criminalized, framed as a threat to national security, and subjected to surveillance, intimidation, and suppression. As we honor Dr. King’s legacy, it is crucial to examine the long history of criminalizing Black protest and the continued struggle for racial justice in the face of systemic repression.
Dr. King and the Power of Nonviolent Protest
Dr. King’s philosophy of nonviolent resistance was deeply influenced by the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi and rooted in the belief that moral and ethical persuasion could bring about societal change. His activism was centered around peaceful demonstrations, sit-ins, and marches designed to expose the injustices faced by Black Americans.
His efforts led to monumental victories such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which dismantled key pillars of segregation and racial disenfranchisement. However, King’s activism also made him a target of constant surveillance and harassment by law enforcement agencies, most notably the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
Under the leadership of FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, King and the broader Civil Rights Movement were viewed as potential threats to national security. The FBI’s infamous Counterintelligence Program (COINTELPRO) sought to discredit, disrupt, and neutralize King and other civil rights leaders. Through illegal wiretaps, smear campaigns, and attempts to sow division within the movement, law enforcement sought to suppress the growing influence of Black activism.
King’s experience with government surveillance and intimidation is a poignant reminder that even the most peaceful forms of protest have been met with suspicion and hostility by the state.
The Criminalization of Black Protest Throughout History
The pattern of criminalizing Black protest did not begin with King, nor did it end with him. From the abolitionist movements of the 19th century to the contemporary Black Lives Matter movement, Black activism has consistently been portrayed as dangerous, subversive, and disruptive.
- The Civil Rights Era
During the 1950s and 60s, law enforcement agencies employed various tactics to criminalize Black activism:
- Surveillance and Harassment: Civil rights leaders and organizations such as the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) were monitored extensively. Activists were often labeled as “agitators” and subjected to unlawful arrests.
- Use of Force: Peaceful protests were met with brutal police violence, as seen during the 1965 Selma march, where state troopers attacked demonstrators with clubs and tear gas.
- Legal Suppression: Laws were enacted to restrict demonstrations, and many protesters were arrested under dubious charges such as “disorderly conduct” or “unlawful assembly.”
Despite the peaceful nature of these protests, law enforcement continued to treat Black activism as a threat rather than a legitimate demand for justice.
- The Black Power Movement and COINTELPRO
Following King’s assassination in 1968, the Civil Rights Movement gave way to the rise of the Black Power Movement, led by groups such as the Black Panther Party. While King championed nonviolent resistance, the Black Panthers embraced self-defense and community empowerment, which further alarmed law enforcement.
Under COINTELPRO, the FBI escalated its efforts to destroy Black activism by:
- Framing Activists as Criminals: Leaders such as Fred Hampton were labeled as dangerous radicals and assassinated in coordinated police raids.
- Infiltration and Disruption: Government operatives infiltrated Black organizations to create internal conflicts and dismantle their effectiveness.
- Negative Media Campaigns: The media was used to portray Black activists as violent extremists, shaping public perception against them.
This era cemented a narrative that equated Black protest with criminality, an association that persists to this day.
Modern-Day Criminalization of Black Protest
Decades after King’s passing, the criminalization of Black activism continues, albeit through more sophisticated means. Movements advocating for racial justice, such as Black Lives Matter (BLM), have faced similar challenges to those encountered during the Civil Rights era.
- The Surveillance State
In the wake of high-profile cases of police violence, the Black Lives Matter movement emerged as a powerful voice against systemic racism and police brutality. However, much like the activists of King’s era, BLM organizers have been subjected to intense surveillance and monitoring by law enforcement agencies.
Reports have revealed that federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), have monitored BLM activists and labeled them as potential threats. Protesters have been placed under surveillance, and their social media activities have been closely scrutinized in an effort to track their movements and strategies.
- Police Militarization and Protest Crackdowns
The militarization of law enforcement has led to increasingly aggressive crackdowns on peaceful demonstrations. Protests against police violence in cities such as Ferguson, Minneapolis, and Louisville have been met with heavily armed officers, tear gas, and mass arrests. The tactics used to suppress these protests are reminiscent of the violent responses to King’s marches in the 1960s.
- Legislative Efforts to Suppress Protests
In recent years, several states have introduced legislation aimed at restricting the right to protest. Laws criminalizing protests that block traffic or disrupt business operations disproportionately impact Black activists and echo historical efforts to delegitimize Black-led movements.
The Ongoing Fight for Justice
Despite the continued criminalization of Black protest, the fight for racial justice persists. Dr. King’s legacy reminds us that nonviolent resistance remains a powerful tool for change, but it also underscores the importance of resilience in the face of opposition.
Lessons from King’s Legacy:
- Persistence in the Face of Adversity: King’s unwavering dedication to justice serves as an example for modern activists facing state repression.
- Solidarity and Collective Action: King believed in the power of unity and coalition-building, emphasizing that the struggle for justice requires collective effort.
- Holding Institutions Accountable: Black activists today continue to push for systemic reforms in policing, voting rights, and economic equity.
Conclusion
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s life and work serve as a powerful testament to the enduring struggle for racial justice. However, his legacy also highlights the persistent criminalization of Black protest—an issue that has transcended generations. From COINTELPRO’s surveillance of civil rights leaders to the modern-day suppression of Black Lives Matter protests, law enforcement continues to view Black activism as a threat rather than a demand for justice.
As we celebrate King’s contributions on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, we must recognize that the fight for racial equality is far from over. Honoring his legacy means not only reflecting on his achievements but also actively challenging the ongoing efforts to silence Black voices and suppress movements for justice. Only through persistent resistance and unwavering commitment can King’s dream of true equality and freedom be fully realized.